Page 525 - A GRAMMAR OF BHOJPURI _ PhD Dissertation 2020 TU
P. 525

cʌl   ɦʌm  okʰʌri  mẽ  muɽi  lʌɡɑwʌtɑni              ɑ    tu
                                    cʌl   ɦʌm  okʰʌri  mẽ  muɽi  lʌɡɑ-ʌt  bɑni           ɑ    tu

                                    walk  1SG    mortar  LOC  head  set-SIM  be.PRES.H  and  2SG

                                     ̈
                                    ɖẽki                cʌlɑke          sʌj   de
                                     ̈
                                    ɖẽki                cʌl-ɑ-ke        sʌj   de
                                    pounding appliance  walk-CAUS-SEQ  trim  give.IMP

                                    'I'm placing my head in the mortar and trim it by pounding.' (05.052)
                           13.6 Conjoined clauses
                           Languages  often  have  morphosyntactic  means  of  linking  two  clauses  of  equal

                           grammatical  status,  i.e.  coordination,  distinct  from  subordination  in  that  in
                           subordination, one clause is grammatically dependent on the other (Payne 1997:336).

                                 But Givón (2001b:348) rejects the traditional independent-dependent
                           dichotomy between the subordinate and co-ordinate clauses, arguing that the

                           dichotomy is unrealistic both functionally and syntactically. It further postulates
                           "while the different types of conjoined clauses may vary among themselves in the

                           degree and type of their connectivity, their pragmatic links tend to be local (narrow
                           scoped). In this, they contrast with pre-posed adverbials but resemble the post-posed
                           ones." Haspelmath (2007: 34) suggests the term 'coordination' as syntactic

                           constructions in which two or more units of the same type are combined into a larger
                           unit and still have the same semantic relations with other surrounding elements.

                                 The coordinator, which is further subcategoraized as conjunction, disjunction,
                           adversative coordination and causal coordination; described in Bhojpuri as follows:

                           13.6.1 Conjunctive coordinator (conjunction)
                                 As attested in Chitoniya Tharu (Paudyal :2013:346-8), Maithili (Yadav

                           2014:148-55), Hindi (Koul 2008:241-44) and Nepali (Upadhyay 2010:68 and
                           Adhikari 2016:117), Bhojpuri has two ways of expressions of conjunctions: suffix -iँ

                           /ɦũ/, -हो /-ɦo/, -ओ   /-o/ 'too/also', and particle आ /ɑ/ 'and', as shown in (86a-d).

                             (86) a.  ओह बीच म2 हम2ँ  jzत रहO, अपन2ँ  लोग के jzतता रहल होई ।
                                    oɦ    bic     mẽ  ɦʌmɦũ        byʌst  rʌɦĩ       ʌpnʌɦũ       loɡ

                                    oɦ    bic     mẽ  ɦʌm-ɦũ       byʌst  rʌɦ-ĩ      ʌpne-ɦũ      loɡ
                                    DIST  middle  LOC  1SG-EMPH  busy     live-PST.H  2SG.H-EMPH  PL

                                    ke    byʌstʌtɑ  rʌɦʌl    ɦoi



                                                                497
   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530