Page 580 - A GRAMMAR OF BHOJPURI _ PhD Dissertation 2020 TU
P. 580

Besides these, as Maithili (Jha, 1993:93 & Yadav, 1996:21), Awadhi (Saksena 1971:29)
                           and Hindi (Koul, 2008:12) retain retroflex stops but Nepali (Adhikari, 2016:10) records

                           post-alveolar, Darai (Dhakal, 2011:51) and Chitoniya Tharu (Paudyal, 2013:61) record
                           them as alveolar and Rājbansi (Wilde, 2008:24) as apico-retroflex. Diachronically, the
                           Sanskrit retroflex stops have been adapted to apico-alveolar in Bhojpuri being

                           typologically nearer to Chitoniya Tharu and Darai, Nepali, and Rājbansi respectively
                           and attests functional-typoligical as well as adaptive approach to grammar.

                           (b) Nasals
                                 Corresponding to the five oral stops in Sanskrit, the basic nasal articulations
                           were also counted to be five by the ancient Indian phoneticians: म /m/, न /n/, ण /ɳ/, ञ


                           /ɲ/ and ङ /ŋ/ (Masica 1991:95). But Bhojpuri has already dropped ण /ɳ/ and ञ /ɲ/ and

                           now they have become allophones of न /n/ as its close neighbours Chitoniya Tharu,
                           Maithili, Awadhi and Nepali do, already mentioned in Chapter 4.1.1. Among them,

                           the former two occur in all three initial, medial and final positions of a word and the
                           last one only occurs at medial and final position in all its neighbours but Bhojpuri
                           displays its word-initial position, already discussed. Moreover, Bhojpuri exhibits !


                           /m ̥ /, ऩ /n ̥ / and # /ŋ ̊ / as the aspirate sonorant counterparts, phonetically breathy in inter-
                           vocalic as well as voiceless in word-final position, in opposition to म /m/, न /n/ and ङ

                           /ŋ/ respectively. But Rājbanshi (Wilde, 2008:24) and Chitoniya Tharu (Paudyal,

                           2013:61) record them as the aspirated nasals whereas Awadhi (Saksena, 1971:44)
                           records only $ह /mɦ/ and &ह /nɦ/. It attests basic Bhojpuri nasals to be nearer to

                           Chitoniya Tharu, Maithili, Rājbansi, Awadhi, Hindi and Nepali respectively
                           functionally and typologically but their aspirate sonorant counterparts are its own

                           inventory that attests adaptive approach to grammar in Bhojpuri.
                           (c) Laterals and flaps

                                 All NIA dialects have a lateral ल /l/ and a flap र /r/ (Masica 1991:97) and so
                           Bhojpuri does have. Besides, Bhojpuri exhibits their aspirate sonorant counterparts, '

                           /l̥ / and ऱ /r̥ / respectively, whereas Awadhi (Saksena, 1971:48-9), Rājbanshi (Wilde,

                           2008:24) and Chitoniya Tharu (Paudyal, 2013:61) exhibit them as aspirated ones.

                           Likewise, Bhojpuri has also the retroflex flap ड़ /ɽ/ in opposition to flap र /r/, and its
                           aspirate sonorant counterpart ढ़ /ɽ ̊ /. Though Hindi, Nepali, Maithili and Awadhi, the

                           close Indo-Aryan neighbours of Bhojpuri, have allophonic pairs of ड /ɖ/ and ड़ /ɽ/, ढ

                                                                552
   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585